3 Search Results

Residential and commercial buildings in China, India, the United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), and Italy consume 39-45% of each nation's primary energy. Building energy models can be used to automatically optimize the return-on-investment for retrofits to improve a building’s energy efficiency. However, with an average of 3,000 building descriptors necessary to accurately simulate a single building, there is a market need to reduce the transaction cost for creating a more robust model for simulating every building in a city and accurately estimate savings prior to capital expenditures.We used two of the world’s fastest supercomputers, assembled unique datasets, and developedmore » innovative algorithms for big data mining to assess different methods to create an accurate building energy model. The team has leveraged a total of eight high performance computing resources and 218 servers to analyze the best methods, metrics, and algorithms for creating an accurate building energy model beyond current industry standards necessary for private-sector financing. The project developed the world’s fastest buildings simulator, has completed over 8 million simulations totaling over 300TB, and mined this data with over 130,000 parallel artificial intelligence algorithms. This was used to quantify accuracy of AI-developed calibration algorithms with results that surpass industry standard guidelines and can identify individual building parameters to between 15% and 32% of their actual value.« less

During the 2015-2016 fiscal year and with financial support from the Florida Building Commission (FBC) and the Florida Roofing and Sheet Metal Contractors Association (FRSA ), the University of Florida (UF) and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) completed Phase I of a study that setup four residential home demonstrations in Florida climate zones CZ-1A and CZ-2A. UF and ORNL are evaluating the hygrothermal (heat and moisture flow) performance and durability of sealed attic construction where expanded foam insulation is applied directly to the underside of the roof deck. The four homes are instrumented for measuring temperature and relative humiditymore » of the indoor living space, the outdoor air and the attic air. In addition, the temperature, relative humidity and moisture content of the roof sheathing are being monitored and recorded by remotely-accessible data acquisition equipment. Here, air leakage tests on the whole house, on the sealed attic and in the HVAC ducts were conducted on all four homes.« less

For this study, a web-based Roof Savings Calculator (RSC) has been deployed for the United States Department of Energy as an industry-consensus tool to help building owners, manufacturers, distributors, contractors and researchers easily run complex roof and attic simulations. RSC simulates multiple roof and attic technologies for side-by-side comparison including reflective roofs, different roof slopes, above sheathing ventilation, radiant barriers, low-emittance roof surfaces, duct location, duct leakage rates, multiple substrate types, and insulation levels. Annual simulations of hour-by-hour, whole-building performance are used to provide estimated annual energy and cost savings from reduced HVAC use. While RSC reported similar cooling savingsmore » to other simulation engines, heating penalty varied significantly. RSC results show reduced cool roofing cost-effectiveness, thus mitigating expected economic incentives for this countermeasure to the urban heat island effect. This paper consolidates comparison of RSC's projected energy savings to other simulation engines including DOE-2.1E, AtticSim, Micropas, and EnergyPlus. Also included are comparisons to previous simulation-based studies, analysis of RSC cooling savings and heating penalties, the role of radiative heat exchange in an attic assembly, and changes made for increased accuracy of the duct model. Finally, radiant heat transfer and duct interaction not previously modeled is considered a major contributor to heating penalties.« less